Know your options
Bid mistakes
in public and private construction
By Attorney
Kenneth E. Voss
Hurtado SC
Few contractors
can say they have never made a mistake in bidding. So the question remains:
What are a bidder's legal and practical remedies in the event it does
make an error?
The answer
is not only important for prime contractors, but also for the many subcontractors
who, from time to time, bid as primes. Even if it never bids as a prime,
it is important for a subcontractor to understand the consequences of
an erroneous bid because, in certain circumstances, the subcontractor's
remedy may be contingent upon the prime's situation.
In cases
of bid errors, because of the complexity of the law as it applies to
varying fact situations and the public or private nature of the work,
it is critical that competent legal advice be sought without delay.
Prime
bidders on public works bids
Wisconsin
Statute Section 66.0901(5), while entitled Corrections, does not even
use the word in the body of the text! It speaks rather of errors, omissions
and mistakes discovered before and after bid opening.
The statute
deals with corrections of errors in bids for public works contracts.
It defines "municipality" to include virtually all municipal
bodies, including the state. The Department of Transportation, however,
is excluded from the definition of "municipality," allegedly
because the statutory procedures are too burdensome given the many contracts
WisDOT has to administer.
Somewhat
different rules apply to Department of Administration bidding. Pursuant
to Wisconsin Statute 16.855, a prime bidder may withdraw its bid at
any time before opening and submit a new bid. Where an error is discovered
within 72 hours after opening, the prime can withdraw its bid but may
lose its bid bond if it was negligent in making the error. If it cannot
settle the matter with the DOA, it will have to sue in Dane County Circuit
Court.
Before
the bid opening
Where a
public bid is discovered to be erroneous before bid opening, the bidder
may, if it is low and wants to perform the contract without regard to
the error, simply do nothing! The bid cannot be corrected at this point.
Bidders
that do not want to be bound to a contract because of the error must
notify the owner of the mistake before bid opening. Upon doing so, the
bid will be returned. If the bid is returned, a revised bid will not
be permitted. Only if all bids are rejected and the project is readvertised
may a new bid be submitted.
After
bid opening and prior to award
After bids
are opened and prior to award, the story is somewhat different. The
low bidder, if it has an error in its bid, must first determine whether
or not it wants to avoid entering into a contract with the owner.
There are
three options available at this point:
- The
bidder may withdraw its bid and secure return of the bid bond provided
that the bidder promptly (as soon as convenient after it discovers
the error) notifies the owner of the mistake, submits satisfactory
evidence of the mistake and explains that it was not caused by the
bidder's negligence in examining the plans and specifications or conforming
with the statute.
- The
bidder may correct its bid, if, in addition to taking the steps above,
it demonstrates that its bid, as corrected, remains the low bid.
- If,
in spite of the error, the bidder wishes to remain eligible for award
of the contract, it may either elect to do nothing or seek a correction
that would not affect its low bid status.
If a bidder
is unable to correct its bid and decides that it does not want to enter
into a contract, it may be faced with forfeiting its bid guarantee or
bond. If the bidder cannot convince the owner otherwise, the bidder
will have to seek return of the bond by filing suit and demonstrating
to the court that it is free of "inexcusable" neglect in making
the error.
On private
projects, where there is no controlling statute, the courts will apply
the common law. Under the common law, a bid can be withdrawn at any
time before the contract is accepted. Thereafter, the contractor has
essentially no relief for an error.
Sub-bidders
on public works
For subcontractors
there is no controlling statute relating to bid errors involving either
public or private works. However, the 1992 decision of the Wisconsin
Court of Appeals in Sandroni vs. Waukesha County Board of Supervisors
can have serious consequences for sub-bidders on either public or private
works.
Essentially,
Sandroni says that a prime bidder has the right to rely on the bid of
a sub-bidder, and if the prime names the sub in its bid and uses its
bid in preparing the prime bid, the sub-bidder is contractually bound
if the prime is awarded the contract. But the prime is not bound to
the sub if the prime chooses, even after award, to contract with a different
subcontractor.
This means
that on public works projects, the sub-bidder must give notice to withdraw
or correct its bid to the prime before the prime submits its bid to
the owner. At that point the prime can still substitute another sub-bidder
if it wishes.
Once the
prime bid is submitted to the owner, however, the prime bidder is subject
to the withdrawal rule discussed earlier. If the prime wants the job,
it can let its bid stand, and if it's low, the sub-bidder will be held
to its bid.
The sub-bidder
may be able to persuade the prime to attempt a correction after bid
opening, but if the correction would affect the prime's standing as
low bidder, the prime is likely to refuse and the sub will still be
stuck with its erroneous bid.
In the
case of private construction, essentially the same rules apply as with
public construction, except that since there is normally no formal bid
opening and the prime is free to withdraw its proposal prior to acceptance
by the owner, the prime is in a somewhat better position to seek correction
of its (and the sub's) bid prior to acceptance or even, in a worst case,
to withdraw its bid.
|
Story Index | Members
List | 2003-04 Schedule |
| Special Sections Main | DailyReporter.com
|
©
2003 Daily Reporter Publishing Co., All Rights Reserved.