Options open
Would-be, public-sector design/build customers
say they wouldn't
rush to limited bidding
By Sean Ryan- Staff Writer
Since local governments only employ design/
build on occasional special projects, its public use will be scattered
at best, no matter what legal restrictions bind it. That's the argument
of public officials who say legislative wrangling over the issue is
much ado about nothing.
 |
|
Dan
Thompson
Executive Director
PLeague of Municipalities
|
"Even if (public) design/build were absolutely
legal, I don't think you would see a lot of it among the municipalities
in Wisconsin just because of the nature of the projects we have," said
Dan Thompson, executive director of the League of Municipalities, a
group lobbying for expanded limited bidding and design/build options.
"I don't have municipalities beating down my door wanting to do design/
build. Most of our projects don't fit design/build."
Thompson said he would only suggest design/build
for major projects like sewage- and water-treatment plants and larger
government buildings like city halls. The construction of these buildings
is rare in Wisconsin, where most municipalities focus on minor infrastructure
projects like sewers, parks and roads, he said.
"Most municipalities don't build a lot
of things where design/build would make much sense," he said.
Looking at the law
Thompson said that beyond its impracticality,
municipalities' legal authority to use design/build also is in question.
"There is no specific statute authorizing
cities and municipalities to use design/build," he said. "There is no
specific statute prohibiting it."
Cities are free, under the current law,
to award contracts to the lowest qualified bidder - including a design/build
contractor. Since design/build contractors take on so much financial
risk and assume such awesome responsibility for entire projects, governments
and contractors alike are far less likely to go design/build if they
can't limit bidding to a preferred short list.
This gray area has led to insecurity in
municipalities where the legality of design/build is unclear, Thompson
said.
Proponents assert that because municipalities
are free entities from the state, they don't need specific authorization
to use design/build, Thompson said.
Opponents cite the provisions in state
statutes that require public bidding on projects and assume the laws
prohibit municipal design/build even though the statutes never specifically
mention it.
Proposed state Senate Bill 198 could paint
over this gray area by specifically authorizing municipalities to use
design/build on projects. The bill was the topic of a public hearing
last April and is currently under revision.
The state government, unlike municipalities,
enjoys the ability to use design/build with the consent of the State
Building Commission. However, like municipalities, it only uses the
method sparingly to remedy issues that plague specific projects.
"The way we look at it here is that the
expected way that we would do a project is design/bid/build, which is
the way the statutes are written," said State Chief Architect Bill King.
"The idea is to use innovative methods when it is of benefit to the
state."
The state uses design/build to solve problems
involving timing and building complexity that traditional design/bid/build
cannot, King said.
"It is not a typical way of doing business
with us," State Project Manager Bob Kilgust said. "It just depends on
the type of building and the critical need."
King said the state's primary use for design/build
is to quicken a project's timetable in order to squeeze it into the
upcoming state budget.
"Each project is going to have its own
unique situations, but it's certainly possible that the time that a
project is perceived as necessary in relation to the current capital
budget has influence," he said. "If something comes up immediately after
the budget has been established we would have to wait two years before
it gets built."
Design/built for speed
Design/build lures local and state governments
with promises that the method speeds up projects, Kilgust said.
"The biggest commonality is that so far
they have all gone very well and have fulfilled our intention of getting
the project on line sooner," he said.
Design/build's timeliness has helped the
delivery method make the cut for three new facilities that the Department
of Corrections needs urgently. These three are the new correctional
facility in Redgranite, the expansion of the Taycheedah Correctional
Facility and the $59 million Milwaukee probation and parole building.
"The main reason we do design/build is
for speed," Kilgust said. "There has been overcrowding in the correctional
system for a number of years."
Design/build also can benefit the state
on projects that are either exceedingly simple or more specialized,
King said. The state would be more willing to use design/build on simple
projects like the state Department of Revenue office building, correctional
facilities and Department of Natural Resources storage buildings.
"We would certainly be more inclined to
do relatively simple types of buildings through design/build," he said.
"You can describe what you want with a simple building much more easily
than you can with a complex building."
Kilgust said design/build is not used on
more complex projects because it is harder for the state to outline
all its requirements for complicated buildings.
"We want to make sure the criteria we are
asking for is as specific as possible," he said. "If you don't, you
won't get it unless you pay for it later."
King said design/build is also used to
accelerate a project's timeline so it can be squeezed into the upcoming
biennial budget.
Hire an expert
Design/build also is useful in more specialized
construction where the expertise to plan and build can be found only
in high-end design/build firms, King said. He cited a prison farm manure
storage building in Waupun as an example.
"If you have a building that is extremely
specialized it may be difficult to find an architect and engineer with
the expertise that you need for the project," he said.
The state likely will have to wait before
using design/build again anytime soon, Kilgust said. The government
is still catching up with the design/build projects set down in the
last biennial budget.