|

Fare, if you must, well
If
youre going to take the time to write a column, you better
make sure you have something worthwhile to say.
Thats why I cannot write, as some editors do, a column that
does nothing more than describe what is in the magazine. You want
to know that, go to the contents page.
Such a Heres whats here column is bad,
an editors cheap way of taking credit for the hard work reporters
did.
Worse is the farewell column. It is maudlin, self-congratulatory,
chocked full of memories and acknowledgements that clearly mean
more to the writer than the reader.
You want weepy, rent Titanic.
Good columns entertain, inform or force a reader to reconsider
what previously seemed obvious.
For instance, no one would, at least in public, deny that green
building is good for the industry and the environment. It took years
for the idea to take root, and while not yet standard on all construction
projects, green building definitely is blooming.
Builders now use wood from sustainable forests, high-efficiency
lighting, solar heating systems and more recycled material than
a Vegas comedian. Its a wholesale improvement in the industry,
and its gaining every day.
How do I know? Because contractors large and small bellow the news
of their latest feats of green wizardry.
If a roofer uses recycled shingles, he puts out a press release.
If an architect designs a building with a green power source, she
lets everyone know about it.
Its exactly what they should do. Green building exists because
the industry talks about it. The more builders talk, the more clients
listen. Its a grassroots movement in its purest form, down
to its colorful buzzword.
But purity, particularly in business, is fleeting. Green building
should have locked the door as soon as it arrived. But it didnt,
and in strolled certification.
Now, simply building green isnt good enough. Its somehow
not valid without a level of Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design certification attached.
Certification isnt enough either. The U.S. Green Building
Council offers, in descending order of cachet, the platinum, gold,
silver and bronze LEED certification packages.
That costs money. Its hard to pin down exactly how much (and
I have been assured over and over that any cost is recovered in
future energy savings), but I have an example.
The $20 million Brown County Mental Health Center project, according
to a story in The Daily Reporter, is seeking a silver LEED. The
actual construction portion of achieving that standard will cost
about $180,000. On top of that, the LEED consulting fees and paperwork
will run about $100,000.
Why does the project need certification? I think its because
everyone else is doing it. If two side-by-side buildings are equally
green, but only one has certification, thats the one getting
the glory, those are the builders glowing with greenness.
No doubt the process of certification has standardized a relatively
new segment of the industry, but I dont buy LEED in the sense
that it somehow makes green greener.
The reward is in doing what is right, not in pointing to a plaque.
You might not agree with me, but at least (I hope) I got you thinking.
And whats the alternative? Five hundred words covering as
many points from the contents page as possible?
And dont get me started again on the smug farewell columns.
The columnist who must write one can achieve some level of quality
and dignity by diverting attention from it, for instance, by picking
a substantial topic to dominate the column, then, if there is space,
to say farewell at the very end.
— Chris Thompson,
Editor
|